New Logo

NUMBER 1207
August 4, 2009

Kentucky Pest News Newsletter
IN THIS ISSUE
TOBACCO
-Blue Mold Continues to Spread in Kentucky
-Is Tobacco Aphid Control Necessary Now?
-Watch for Hornworms and Grasshoppers
VEGETABLES
-Tomato Disease Update
-Downy Mildew of Cucurbits Threatens Kentucky
SHADE TREES & ORNAMENTALS
-Lace Bug Feeding Injury Appearing
HOUSEHOLD PEST
-Foreign Grain Beetles - New House Beetles
PESTICIDE NEWS
-Cancellation of Certain Uses of PCNB Fungicide
DIAGNOSTIC LAB HIGHLIGHTS
INSECT TRAP COUNT




TOBACCO
Blue Mold Continues to Spread in Kentucky (added 8/6/09)
By Kenny Seebold


On July 16, a fairly significant outbreak of blue mold was found in several fields located along the Clark - Montgomery county line.  Since that time, we have confirmed cases in Fleming, Lincoln, Garrard, and Madison Counties.  Continued rainfall and periods of overcast weather mean that we will see further spread of blue mold in Kentucky and surrounding areas.

Growers with susceptible crops in the field should begin application of fungicides as quickly as possible to help protect tobacco and to contain the outbreak.  If blue mold is active on tobacco at the time of fungicide application, I recommend treatment with Quadris at 12 fl oz/A; use 8-10 fl oz/A for protection.  Growers may also use the combination of mancozeb (Dithane, Penncozeb, or Manzate) plus dimethomorph (Acrobat or Forum).  In this case, apply 2 lb/A of mancozeb and 3-7 oz/A of dimethomorph (user higher rates on bigger tobacco or if active disease is found).  Actigard will probably not be a good choice for tobacco that may have been exposed to the pathogen, and Actigard needs to be in place 4-5 days before exposure to the blue mold pathogen to activate plant defenses.  However, for late-set crops that have not been exposed, Actigard could be an attractive option for controlling blue mold.  It offers the advantages of having a fairly long (10 days) residual period, and is very systemic.  The latter part means that using drop nozzles for full coverage is not as critical as for other products.

When applying fungicides for control of blue mold, good coverage is critical for getting adequate control of disease – this means using an appropriate application volume and drop nozzles to get fungicide materials down into the lower plant canopy.  The need to get after blue mold is really strong in the threatened area, because we are looking at some very favorable conditions for blue mold in the coming days.  According to the forecast, we are going to have cooler-than-normal day and night temperatures, and mostly clear days.  Long-distance transport will not be favorable, but we could see an explosion of blue mold within a field that has the disease and also short distances from these fields, mainly due to very favorable night-time temperatures.

Another point to consider is that tobacco that has been topped, or will be topped in a few days, will be less susceptible to blue mold, and may not need an application of fungicide.  However, blue mold loves suckers, so good sucker control will be important.

Finally, in areas west of the current outbreaks, the need to protect against blue mold is not as critical as for the affected zones.  Those wishing to “play it safe” can follow the protectant guidelines listed above; if Quadris is used, they can also count on protection against target spot and frogeye if these diseases are present.  The other approach is to monitor the blue mold situation and be prepared to spray immediately if movement is predicted from known sources of blue mold, or when blue mold is first found.

Please keep a close watch on tobacco in your area, and let me know if you find or suspect blue mold in your area.  If the blue mold situation changes, we’ll post an alert through the Kentucky Blue Mold Warning System and on the Kentucky Tobacco Disease Information Page (www.uky.edu/Ag/KPN/kyblue/kyblue.htm).   Please urge producers (particularly in eastern KY)to check their crops regularly for blue mold, and let me know if you suspect or find the disease in your area.

 
 
Is Tobacco Aphid Control Necessary Now?
By Lee Townsend

Image 1
Figure 1. A lightly infested tobacco leaf for late in the growing season.

At this point in the season, the time left until topping is the major factor to consider when making a decision on aphid control.  Yield and quality losses to aphids occur gradually - from the onset of infestation (about 4 to 6 weeks after transplant) until topping. Most of the loss is due to reduced leaf size and weight from heavy infestations. There is little chance for return from attempting to control heavy infestations just before harvest. The loss has already occurred.

If the field will be topped within about a week (or has been topped), aphids have already done their damage; there is no benefit to an insecticide application that is limited to aphid control. Topping the plants not only removes the greatest concentration of aphids but also the tender tissue on which they prefer to feed and where they cause the most new damage. Aphids present on the discarded tops will remain there and will continue to feed until the leaves dry completely. Few, if any, will find their way back to a plant. Aphids present on tobacco that has been topped are not a cause for concern at this time in the season.

Aphids can be a problem in late set fields that are still several weeks from being topped. Foliar sprays can be effective if applied when about 20% of the plants in the field are infested with aphids. Judge the benefit of control by looking at new foliage at the top of the plant. If aphid build ups are not seen on these leaves, then the sprays are working – they are more effective at protecting uninfested foliage than at killing aphids lower down on the stalks.

 

 
 
Watch for Hornworms and Grasshoppers
By Lee Townsend


Hornworms and grasshoppers are the most common insect pests that are active in tobacco that has been topped. They can be very destructive during the 3 to 4 weeks the crop remains in the field before harvest. Most insecticides used on tobacco should be effective for about a week. After that time, weekly field checks should be made to detect any late pest buildups.

Image 2
Figure 2. Tobacco hornworm moth.

Hornworm moths fly over a relatively long period of time so worm season can occur over an extended interval. Grasshoppers can cause extensive leaf loss in tobacco fields. They usually occur in grassy pastures and can be driven into crop fields as hay is cut and cured. Check for grasshoppers in hay fields and pastures adjacent to tobacco before clipping it. An average of 10 or more hoppers per square yard can mean trouble if they move to tobacco. It is much better to control these insects before they get into the crop than to try a rescue application later. Cythion (malathion) and Sevin are labeled for grasshopper control in pastures and hay fields. See the label for rates and restrictions.

Imag e3
Figure 3. Differential grasshopper.


Dipel and Tracer are effective and safe insecticides for hornworm control but will not kill grasshoppers. If both of these insects are active in tobacco, then Orthene is the best choice. Often an insecticide is included when the sucker control chemical is applied. Depending on the product used this approach should control insects present at the time of application. However, the residual effect will not last for the entire time the crop stands before harvest. Sunlight and weathering will gradually reduce the amount of chemical present on the leaf. This is a natural occurrence and generally means that pesticide levels should be at acceptable levels if label rates and harvest intervals are followed.

 

 
 

VEGETABLES

Tomato Disease Update (added 8/6/09)
By Kenny Seebold


The unprecedented cool weather we’ve had in July, coupled with above-normal precipitation, has been stressful on Kentucky’s tomato growers – commercial and homeowners alike.  Diseases have added to this stress load, and we are seeing a fair amount of early blight and Septoria blight show up at the Plant Disease Diagnostic Lab.  These are serious problems and can cause losses if left uncontrolled; however, they pale in comparison to another problem that has literally exploded in the past week – late blight.  This is a fairly uncommon disease in Kentucky, and rarely causes widespread losses.  In the eastern U.S., though, a massive epidemic is underway that has caused some severe damage to tomatoes and potatoes in 16 states.  According to Dr. Meg McGrath of Cornell University, it is unprecedented to see this disease so early and widespread.  Part of the blame goes back shipments of infected tomato transplants from a large supplier that went out to garden centers and home supply stores across the region.  I don’t know if this is the root of our epidemic, but it’s certain that we are now facing a crisis on tomatoes and potatoes in Kentucky.

Back around the 9th of July, I sent out an e-mail alert that we’d confirmed late blight in Laurel and Larue counties.  Since that time, we’ve had very favorable conditions for late blight in terms of temperature and moisture.   Reports began rolling in during the week of July 27, and by the end of that week we’d confirmed cases in Breathitt, Jackson, Johnson, Montgomery, and Wolfe Counties.  All reports thus far have been on tomatoes and epidemic seems to be confined to eastern Kentucky for the moment, although there have been unconfirmed cases in central Kentucky as well.  Growers in eastern Kentucky are at greatest risk, but all areas in the state need to be on the lookout for late blight.  Prevention should be our focus at this stage, since we don’t know where this disease is headed next!

The Disease.  Late blight is caused by Phytophthora infestans, a fungus-like organism, and is a fast-moving and highly destructive disease of tomatoes and potatoes under cool and wet conditions.  Late blight epidemics in the late 1840’s were responsible for the Irish potato famine and subsequent migration of millions of people to the United States.  All plant parts are affected, including fruit and tubers.  Total losses are common in gardens and fields if control measures are not put in place.  Late blight can easily enter greenhouses and high tunnels as well.

Symptoms.  Early symptoms of late blight are large water-soaked blotches on foliage that will enlarge and form green-to-brown lesions.  Sporulation may be evident on the undersides of lesions under moist conditions; this sporulation will be gray to white in color.  Necrotic leaf tissue will blacken and shrivel, giving affected plants a blighted appearance.  The pathogen will also attack petioles and stems, killing the plant in some cases.  Tomato fruit affected by late blight develop as darkened spots that enlarge over time, and fungal growth may be seen in rotted tissue.  Infected fruit are invaded by secondary organisms and develop soft rot.  Potato tubers can become infected from spores washed from leaves into the soil and will decay.

Control – Commercial Growers.  Preventive application of fungicides is necessary to prevent losses to late blight.  Protectant fungicides such as chlorothalonil (Bravo and generics), maneb, and mancozeb (Dithane, Penncozeb, or Manzate), and fixed coppers can help when disease pressure is low; however, when inoculum levels increase or if disease is found in fields, stronger products are recommended.  Late-blight-specific fungicides are summarized below (as published by Dr. Meg McGrath, Cornell University):

Curzate 60DF (Group 27). 3.2-5 ounces per acre (3.2 ounces for potatoes). 5 oz on 5-day interval when late blight present. 30 oz/A seasonal max.  3 d PHI.EPA Reg No. 352-592.  Active ingredient is Cymoxanil.  12 h REI.  Must be tank-mixed with a protectant fungicide.

Forum (Group 40). 6 fluid ounces. 30 fl oz/A seasonal max.  2 consecutive spray max.  4 d PHI. EPA Reg No. 241-427.  Dimethomorph. 12 h REI.  Must be applied with another fungicide.

Gavel (Group 22). 1.5-2 pounds. 16 lb or 8 application seasonal max. 5 d PHI tomato; 3 d PHI for potato (14 d in some states).  Latron surfactant recommended. EPA Reg No. 62719-441.  Zoxamide + mancozeb. 48 h REI.

Omega 500F (Group 29).  5.5 fl oz for potatoes only.  3.5 pts/A seasonal max. 14 d PHI. EPA Reg No. 71512-1-100.  Fluazinam. 48 h REI.

Presidio (Group 43).  3-4 fl oz for tomatoes only. 12 fl oz/A seasonal max.  2 consecutive spray max.  EPA Reg No. 59639-140.  Flupicolide. 12 h REI. 2 d PHI

Previcur Flex (Group 28). 0.7-1.5 pint (1.2 pints max for potatoes).  7.5 pts/A seasonal max for tomatoes; 6 pts/A for potatoes.  5 d PHI for tomato; 14 d PHI for potato.          EPA Reg No. 264-678.  Propamocarb hydrochloride. 12 h REI.

Ranman (Group 21). 1.4–2.75 fluid ounces (2.1-2.75 for tomato). 16.5 fl oz or 6 application seasonal max for tomatoes; 27.5 fl oz or 10 applications for potatoes. 0 d PHI for tomatoes; 7 d for potatoes.         EPA Reg No. 71512-3-279.  Cyazofamid. 12 h REI.

Revus (Group 40). 5.5 to 8 fluid ounces. 2 consecutive spray max.  32 fl oz/A seasonal max.  1 d PHI for tomato; 14 d PHI for potato.         EPA Reg No. 100-1254.  Mandipropamid. 12 h REI.

Strobilurins, such as azoxystrobin (Quadris), pyraclostrobin (Cabrio/Headline), and fenamidone (Reason) have not performed as well as the products listed above in university trials.  Ridomil Gold Bravo and Ridomil Gold Copper are not recommended due to widespread resistance in pathogen populations to Ridomil.  Consult ID-36 (KY Production Guide for Commercial Vegetables) for specific use rates.  Keep in mind that some of these products may be difficult to find in local dealerships and may have to be special-ordered.  Of the materials listed above, Previcur Flex, Forum, Curzate, or Gavel may be the easiest to obtain in Kentucky, and are effective against late blight when used as directed.

Growers need to scout plantings regularly for late blight and other diseases.  Preventive fungicide applications are recommended at this point for all Kentucky tomato and potato growers to help combat late blight, and also early blight and Septoria (tomato).  Growers should not wait to see symptoms of late blight before treating.   A good protectant program aimed at late-blight prevention will also aid against other foliar fungal diseases.  During favorable conditions, sprays need to be made every 5-7 days, and every 7-10 days during drier weather. 

If late blight is found, growers should immediately destroy plants in the affected area plus bordering plants (as these are likely infected).  Plants can be sprayed with an herbicide, or removed and disked under.  Do not handle plants when they are wet, as this may spread disease; perform this operation when conditions are sunny and dry if possible.  At the end of the season, promptly destroy crop residues.  Do not leave cull piles out in the open, as the pathogen can spread or potentially survive in this residue.  Bury this material if at all possible.

Control – Homeowners.  The general management practices listed above apply also to the homeowner.  Regular scouting of plantings, and prompt removal of infected plants is an important consideration.  The bulk of cases reported thus far have come from home gardens, where regular application of fungicides is less common than in commercial fields.  Few fungicides are available to home gardeners; however, products containing chlorothalonil, maneb/mancozeb, or fixed copper are the tools of choice.  These should be applied regularly, and the user should refer to the product label for rates, PHI, and safety precautions.  These products, as mentioned earlier, will not function well if pressure is high or if disease is present before spray programs are started.

Control – Organic Producers.  Control measures for organic producers are similar to those recommended for home gardeners.  OMRI-approved fungicides such as fixed-copper (depends on the product) can be used in a preventive program.  Other OMRI-approved products include:  Sporatec, Sonata, Serenade Max, Oxidate, and Companion.  As with the protectants recommended for home gardeners, these products do not perform well under high disease pressure or if disease is present prior to treatment.  Consult product labels for rates, PHI, and safety precautions.

 
 
Downy Mildew of Cucurbits Threatens Kentucky (added 8/6/09)
By Kenny Seebold


In recent weeks, downy mildew has been active on cucurbits in the eastern seabord, Michigan, and parts of Canada.  Earlier this week, the disease was confirmed in northwestern Illinois.  Since our weather usually moves west-to-east, this means that are now looking at the chance that downy mildew could move into Kentucky.  We don’t have confirmed cases at the moment, either from the field or the sentinel plots that we have near Owensboro, Lexington, and Quicksand; however, there is an unconfirmed report from Wayne County.  As you’ve seen, the weather has been great (unfortunately) for downy mildews to develop judging from the amount of blue mold on tobacco and late blight we’re seeing on tomatoes.  Please be on the lookout for downy mildew on cucurbits in the field, and note that we will have conditions that favor development and spread of this disease in the coming days.  Downy mildew on cucurbits is an aggressive, fast-moving disease and can be really hard to stop when it gets started. Under the right conditions, infection levels can go from 10% of leaf area infected to 90-100% in less than a week!

Identifying downy mildew on cucurbits can be a little tricky, because symptoms on each species vary to some degree. What's more, downy mildew can be confused with powdery mildew. Both of these diseases are similar in that they are caused by obligate pathogens, meaning that the pathogen must be associated with a host plant to survive. The downy mildew pathogen, Pseudoperonospora cubensis, is not a true fungus. It belongs to the Oomycetes and is related to the pathogen that causes blue mold of tobacco; however, powdery mildew is caused by Podosphaera xanthii and belongs to the Ascomycete group of "true" fungi. Although downy mildew is more common in wet weather, fogs and heavy dews can contribute enough moisture to allow infection during "dry" weather. Powdery mildew is more likely to be a problem when conditions are warm and dry, and it tends to develop gradually over the course of several weeks. In terms of symptoms, the two diseases can be confused. Early on, both can cause yellow spots on the upper surface of a leaf. In the case of downy mildew, leaf spots tend to be small, blocky, and are limited by leaf veins, while spots associated with powdery mildew are round and somewhat diffuse.  On the underside of a leaf with downy mildew, lesions will initially appear sunken and slightly water-soaked. As downy mildew progresses, infected leaves will take on a scorched appearance.  Leaf yellowing (chlorosis) is more common with powdery mildew, and infected leaves will be covered with a white, talc-like, superficial growth (from which powdery mildew takes its name) that tends to favor the upper leaf surface; however, it is not uncommon to find colonies of the powdery mildew fungus on lower leaf surfaces, stems, or vines and even fruit if disease is severe. One of the key features of downy mildew is the pattern of sporulation, which occurs only on the underside of an infected leaf and has a faint, fuzzy or "downy" appearance.  It is easier to observe sporulation with downy mildew in the morning when there's plenty of leaf wetness. It's very easy to distinguish the downy and powdery mildew pathogens at the microscopic level; sporangia of downy mildew are formed on sporangiophores that have a distinctive branching pattern that gives them the appearance of "deer antlers". Conidia of powdery mildew are formed in chains on relatively simple structures. If downy mildew is suspected, send a sample in to the Plant Disease Diagnostic Lab in Lexington or Princeton for examination.

At this point, and as weather permits, growers who are not on a preventive fungicide program should consider an application as soon as possible; spray intervals need to be fairly tight – in the 7-day range if possible.  Chlorothalonil and, to a lesser extent, mancozeb (or maneb for pumpkin and winter squash) offer reasonable protection against downy mildew if sprayed on a regular schedule; there are several downy mildew-specific materials that can be used as well, such as Acrobat (or its liquid counterpart, Forum), Ridomil Gold Bravo (Ridomil-resistant strains of the downy mildew pathogen are common, so this option is questionable), Revus (a new fungicide from Syngenta – very active against downy mildew), Presidio (a new material from Valent, and a strong performer), and Ranman (ISK / FMC product).  Previcur Flex is another effective alternative.  Please see ID-36, the Vegetable Production Guide for Commercial Growers, for rate.  Note that we are not recommending strobilurins (Quadris, Cabrio, Reason, Flint) for control of downy mildew, as resistance to this class of chemistry is high in the strains of P. cubensis in the U.S., and these compounds have lost much of their effectiveness against downy mildew.

 

SHADE TREES & ORNAMENTALS
Bacterial Wetwood and Slime Flux of Landscape Trees
By John Hartman


Recent inquiries by County Extension Agents and landscape maintenance persons suggest that wetwood disease and its associated product, slime flux, are fairly common in Kentucky landscape trees this summer.  The sometimes foul-smelling and unsightly seepage from wounds in the bark or wood of various shade trees is known as slime flux.  It occurs most commonly on bacterial wetwood-infected trees, such as elm, mulberry, poplar, oak, birch, and maple.  Although slime flux development is seasonal, evidence of wetwood and slime flux-stained bark is visible anytime.

Symptoms and Cause.  Tree owners will first notice a vertical streak of wet bark on the trunk beginning at a crack or wound up on the trunk and extending all the way to the ground (Figure 4).  This seepage is often accompanied by a discoloration of the bark in the area where the fluid flows (Figure 5).  Wetwood seepage originates from infections of the heartwood and inner sapwood by common soil-inhabiting bacteria such as Enterobacter cloacae (Erwinia nimmipressuralis).  There are many other bacterial species also associated with wetwood.  Wetwood bacteria are capable of growing anaerobically (without oxygen) in the internal wood tissues of the tree and leaving the wood of trunks, limbs, and roots water-soaked.  Methane and osmotic or metabolic liquids, two by-products of the bacterial activity, accumulate under pressure and are forced out of the tree through the nearest available opening, usually a trunk wound or branch stub.  Pruning a branch or taking a core with an increment borer can sometimes release the materials under pressure, squirting the worker with foul-smelling liquid and gas.

Image 4
Figure 4. Pin oak with wetwood fluid running down the trunk.


Image 5
Figure 5. Elm with wetwood, showing discoloration of the bark where fluid has contacted the bark.

Image 6
Figure 6. Mulberry with wetwood disease and liquid seepage colonized by microbes turning the fluid into slime flux.

Normally flowing to the wounded bark surface, the wetwood fluid is a clear watery liquid containing several nutrients.  On the surface it soon changes into a brown, slimy ooze, as a result of feeding by fungi, yeasts, bacteria, and insects (Figure 6).  This surface slime flux may kill injured cambium and bark surface organisms as well as grass growing near the base of the tree.  Otherwise, wetwood disease does not appear to be directly harmful to the tree.  However, as the internal tissues are infected, the tree may lose some of its stored carbohydrate reserves and have less energy for warding off other diseases or insects or the effects of drought or pruning.  Once a tree is infected, the disease does not normally go away.

Wetwood-infected trees have an internal core of wood that is wet but not decayed. These infected branch, trunk, and root tissues also have a high pH. Wetwood-infected wood is resistant to decay by fungi.  The extent of wetwood spread in the tree may be limited by tree defenses; however, wetwood can spread into new tissues as new injuries occur.  Thus deep injection holes and pruning can expand wetwood infection.  Tree workers must take care to avoid pruning live branches on infected trees.

Control. Thus far, no effective preventive or curative measure is known.  If the bark is being stained it may be helpful to drain the slime flux away from the branch or trunk so that it drips on the ground.  Drilling a hole into the tree and inserting a copper or semi-rigid plastic tube has helped in some cases; however, this results in additional wounding and the threat of expanded wetwood or decay should be considered.  Loose dead bark should be carefully cut away so that the area can dry.

BACK TO INDEX
 
 
Lace Bug Feeding Injury Appearing
By Lee Townsend


Image 7
Figure 7. Lace bug feeding spot - upper leaf surface (photo by P. Bachi).

Image 8
Figure 8. Lace bug - lower leaf surface (photo P. Bachi).

Lace bugs use their sucking mouthparts to feed on plant sap. Damage ranges from a few scattered tiny white to yellow spots on the upper surfaces of leaves to bleached white leaves that drop prematurely in late summer. Common species in Kentucky feed on azalea (azalea lace bug); hawthorn, cotoneaster, pyracantha, Japanese quince (hawthorn lace bug); rhododendron and mountain laurel  (rhododendron lace bug); and ash, hickory, mulberry, and sycamore (sycamore lace bug). Lace bugs can be confirmed as culprits by looking at the undersides of spotted leaves for the insects, white cast skins, tarry waste spots, or eggs (larger dark spots along leaf midribs). The adult is about 1/8 inch long with lace-like wings that cover the abdomen. Nymphs are dark and spiny.

Tolerate light to moderate damage as much as possible; often the plant is not harmed by these insects. Prune damaged foliage if practical and follow sound practices to promote plant health. Insecticidal soap and horticultural oils can be used for control with minimal impact on natural enemies; most other insecticides will provide control, as well. Thorough spray coverage to lower leaf surfaces is necessary with all products.

 Lace wing eggs are inserted into plant tissue so they are protected from sprays. Consequently, more than one application may be needed for control. These applications must be made at the first signs of leaf spots to be effective. A soil drench with an imidacloprid product can provide good preventive control where chronic infestations are a problem. The drench should be applied in the spring according to label directions.

BACK TO INDEX

 

HOUSEHOLD PEST
Foreign Grain Beetles - New House Beetles
By Mike Potter

Image 9
Figure 9. Foreign grain beetle view from below (V points to knob).

Foreign grain beetles are very small (about 1/16-inch long) brownish insects that are often mistaken for flour beetles or other stored product insects. The key characteristic to look for in identifying this beetle is the presence of a slight projection or knob on each front corner of the segment directly behind the head. A microscope or good quality hand lens is necessary to see this character (See Entomology Entfact-610, Foreign Grain Beetle) http://www.ca.uky.edu/entomology/entfacts/entfactpdf/ef610.pdf .

Foreign grain beetles are frequently a problem in new construction (less than 5 years old). They are one of a group of beetles called "fungus beetles" that feed on molds and fungi growing on poorly seasoned lumber or wet plaster and wall board. If they are found infesting flour, grain, or other stored products, the products are generally moldy or in poor condition. When new homes are built, damp wood is often covered with molds or mildew which attracts the beetles. The beetles are also attracted to accumulations of sawdust trapped behind walls during construction. Eggs are laid on this food material and the larvae develop on the surface fungi. The adult beetles usually become a problem in late summer when they move out of wall voids and are attracted to windows and lights. In older homes, foreign grain beetles can also be associated with plumbing leaks, condensation problems, or poor ventilation.

There is no fast or easy way to get rid of foreign grain beetles. Control is difficult because the breeding source of the beetles is concealed within the walls. The ultimate solution is time and patience. Most new homes dry out naturally within the first few years and the fungi and molds disappear along with the beetles. Drying time can be enhanced by increasing ventilation, e.g., by use of fans and air conditioning. A vacuum cleaner can be used to remove beetles emerging from hidden locations. Pest control companies may be able to provide limited relief by locating the infested wall areas or source of dampness (usually in the rooms where the beetles are most abundant), and injecting residual aerosols or dusts into cracks and crevices beneath baseboards and into the wall voids.

If the homeowner can tolerate the emergence of the adult beetles during August-September, the problem will usually resolve itself. Most newly-built houses cease to have problems after a few summers, and the beetles usually will not be evident during the rest of the year. Some comfort can be taken in the fact that foreign grain beetles are only a nuisance by their presence. They do not bite or damage wood, fabric or stored foods in a sound condition.

 

BACK TO INDEX

 
 
 
PESTICIDE NEWS & VIEWS
Cancellation of Certain Uses of PCNB Fungicide
By Paul Vincelli


Manufacturers of disease-control products containing PCNB fungicide (=pentachloronitrobenzene) have received U.S. Environmental Protection Agency approval to cancel certain uses of this fungicide.  Uses to be cancelled include: golf course roughs; residential sites including lawns, yards, and ornamental plants and gardens around homes and apartments; grounds around day care facilities; school yards; parks (except industrial parks); playgrounds; and athletic fields (except professional and college fields).  Affected products include Terraclor, Turfcide and various products such as PCNB 75WSP, PCNB 20%WDG, and others.

More information on this is provided in the Federal Register, Vol. 74, No. 134, Wednesday, July 15, 2009, page 34337, docket identification number EPA-HQ-OPP-2008-0935 (available online at http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/index.html).  However, the published notice does not provide reasons for this voluntary cancellation of certain uses.  

 

BACK TO INDEX

 

DIAGNOSTIC LAB HIGHLIGHTS
By Julie Beale and Paul Bachi


Recent agronomic samples in the PDDL have included anthracnose and Lepto leaf spot  on alfalfa; Rhizoctonia root/stem rot and potassium deficiency on soybean; northern corn leaf blight and potassium deficiency on corn; black shank, blue mold, target spot, brown spot, frogeye, tomato spotted wilt virus, Fusarium wilt, weather fleck, potassium deficiency and growth regulator injury on tobacco.

On fruit and vegetable samples, we have diagnosed downy mildew and anthracnose on grape; Phytophthora crown/root rot on blueberry; Septoria leaf spot on blackberry; Phytophthora crown rot on raspberry; cedar-apple rust and sooty blotch on apple; scab and brown rot on peach; leaf spot (Coccomyces) on cherry; anthracnose on bean; southern blight on pepper; anthracnose and Rhizoctonia root/stem rot on squash; bacterial spot, early blight, Septoria leaf spot, leaf mold, late blight, southern blight, buckeye rot, tomato spotted wilt virus, and stinkbug injury on tomato; blossom end rot on watermelon; and Cercospora leaf spot on zucchini. 

On ornamentals and turf, we have seen anthracnose on liriope; Cladosporium leaf blotch on peony; Rhizoctonia root/stem rot on petunia; canker on boxwood; scab on crabapple; cedar-quince rust on hawthorn; black root rot on holly; Phytophthora crown rot on rhododendron; Actinopelte leaf spot, Botryosphaeria canker and bacterial leaf scorch on oak; take-all patch on bentgrass; brown patch on fescue; and root decline on zoysiagrass. 

 

INSECT TRAP COUNT
July 24-31
By Patricia Lucas


Location

Princeton, KY

Lexington, KY

Black cutworm

95

18

Armyworm

112

139

Corn earworm

26

10

European corn borer

3

8

Southwestern corn borer

146

0

Fall armyworm

9

0



Graphs of insect trap counts for the 2008 season are available on the IPM web site at -http://www.uky.edu/Ag/IPM/ipm.htm.
View trap counts for Fulton County, Kentucky at - 
http://ces2.ca.uky.edu/fulton/InsectTraps



NOTE: Trade names are used to simplify the information presented in this newsletter. No endorsement by the Cooperative Extension Service is intended, nor is criticism implied of similar products that are not named.


BACK TO KY PEST NEWS HOME