Online Publications

PDF file available

PR-480

2002 Cool-Season Grass Grazing Tolerance Variety Report

R.F. Spitaleri, J.C. Henning, T.D. Phillips, G.D. Lacefield, C.T. Dougherty, and E. Vanzant

Introduction

Cool-season grasses such as tall fescue and orchardgrass are the primary pasture grasses in Kentucky. Other species such as perennial ryegrass, festulolium, and prairie brome can be used in pasture systems. Little is known about the effect of variety on the grazing tolerance of these cool-season grass species.

The purpose of this report is to summarize current research on the grazing tolerance of varieties of tall fescue, orchardgrass, perennial ryegrass, and other species when they are subjected to continuous, heavy grazing pressure by cattle within the grazing season. The main focus will be on plant stand survival.

Description of the Tests

Grass variety tests for grazing tolerance were established in Lexington in the fall of 1999, 2000, and 2001. The soils at this location are well-drained silt loams and are well suited to tall fescue, orchardgrass, and ryegrass production. Plots were 5 ft x 15 ft in a randomized complete block design with each variety replicated six times. In each test, 20 pounds of seed per acre (8 pounds/acre for timothy) were planted into a prepared seedbed using a disk drill. Grazing began in April and was continuous until late September. Plots were grazed down to below 4 inches quickly by feeder steers and kept at that height or below for the remainder of the grazing season. Supplemental hay or soybean hulls were fed during periods of slowest growth. Animals were removed from plots after all fall growth had been removed and when little regrowth was expected. Visual ratings of percent stand were made in the fall and spring after each grazing season. Grass plots were fertilized with 60 pounds of actual N per acre in the spring, and other fertilizer (lime, P, and K) was applied as needed.

Results and Discussion

Weather data for Lexington for 2000, 2001, and 2002 are presented in Table 1. The 2002 summer was the fourth hottest and driest on record. Data on percent stand are presented in Tables 2 through 9. Statistical analyses were performed on all entries (including experimentals) to determine if the apparent differences are truly due to variety. Varieties not significantly different from the highest numerical value in a column are marked with one asterisk (*). To determine if two varieties are truly different, compare the difference between the two varieties to the Least Significant Difference (LSD) at the bottom of the column. If the difference is equal to or greater than the LSD, the varieties are truly different when grown under the conditions at a given location. The Coefficient of Variation (CV), which is a measure of the variability of the data, is included for each column of means. Low variability is desirable, and increased variability within a study results in higher CVs and larger LSDs.

Kentucky 31 tall fescue with the endophyte (KY31+) is considered to be the most grazing-tolerant variety and is the grazing-tolerant check entry in all tall fescue trials. The central questions in grazing tolerance among tall fescues are: 1) Can endophyte-free varieties persist as well as KY31+, and 2) Will the new novel, or "friendly," endophyte materials persist as well as other tolerant varieties?

After three seasons, Cattle Club and Duo (a fescue-ryegrass hybrid) were comparable to KY31+, as were some endophyte-free experimental lines (e.g., KYFA9301 and KYFA9304) (Table 2). Three novel endophyte lines—Jesup (542), Jesup (584), and GA5 (584)—were comparable to KY31+ as well. The novel endophyte designation of these three lines contains the tall fescue variety (e.g., Jesup) and the particular strain of novel endophyte (e.g., 542 or 584). Jesup (542) is the experimental designation for the commercial variety MaxQ. It is logical that the extreme drought of 2002 should have led to greater stand loss in lines without grazing tolerance. The endophyte, therefore, is not necessary for persistence or tolerance to grazing abuse, at least for Central Kentucky conditions where other factors such as soil fertility and topsoil depth are not limiting.

Perennial ryegrass or ryegrass hybrids tended to be more persistent than prairie brome species (Table 5). Citadel, Linn, Duo, and Spring Green all had greater than 50% stand after two seasons. Some separation in ryegrass lines was observed even after one grazing season (Table 6).

Orchardgrass persistence is reported in Tables 7-9. Several commercial varieties of orchardgrass persisted well even after three seasons of heavy grazing, including Hallmark, Tekapo, and Haymate.

Table 10 (fescue, perennial ryegrass, and prairiegrass) and Table 11 (orchardgrass) summarize information about distributors and persistence across locations and years for all varieties in these tests. Varieties are listed in alphabetical order with experimental varieties listed at the bottom. Shaded areas indicate that the variety was not in that particular test (labeled at the top of the column), while clear blocks mean the variety was in the test. A single asterisk (*) means that the variety was not significantly different from the top-yielding variety in that study. It is best to choose a variety that has performed well over several years.

Summary

These studies indicate that there are varieties of cool-season grasses that can tolerate overgrazing for multiple seasons and still maintain reasonable stands. Some varieties of endophyte-free as well as novel, or "friendly," endophyte tall fescue have been able to maintain equivalent stands to endophyte-infected KY31. There is no "KY31+" equivalent in orchardgrass; that is, no variety has historically been proven to be tolerant of overgrazing. Therefore, conclusions about orchardgrass grazing tolerance are limited. However, some varieties have exhibited good tolerance to grazing abuse even after three seasons.

This information should be used along with yield and other information (for example, relative maturity in spring) in selecting the best grass variety for each individual use. It is not recommended that tall fescue or orchardgrass be continuously overgrazed as was done in these trials. While several varieties expressed tolerance to the level of grazing pressure used in these trials, overgrazing greatly reduces yield and therefore profitability of these varieties. This information should be an indication of those varieties that will better withstand the occasional overgrazing that sometimes becomes necessary in livestock operations.

Good management for maximum life from any grass would be to allow it to get completely established before grazing and to avoid overgrazing it during times of extreme stress, such as drought.

Table 1. Temperature and rainfall at Lexington during the 2000, 2001, and 2002 growing seasons.

 

2000

2001

2002

Temp

Rainfall

Temp

Rainfall

Temp

Rainfall

º F

DEP

IN

DEP

º F

DEP

IN

DEP

º F

DEP

IN

DEP

JAN

32

+1

3.48

+0.62

31

0

0.9

-1.9

38

+7

2.12

-0.74

FEB

43

+8

4.97

+1.76

40

+5

3.2

0

38

+3

1.28

-1.93

MAR

48

+4

3.47

-0.93

40

-4

2.7

-1.7

45

+1

7.93

+3.53

APR

53

-2

4.10

+0.22

59

+4

1.7

-2.2

58

+3

4.19

+0.31

MAY

67

+3

2.96

-1.51

66

+2

4.9

+0.4

61

-3

4.36

-0.11

JUN

73

+1

3.22

-0.44

71

-1

2.0

-1.6

74

+2

2.45

-1.21

JUL

74

-2

3.42

-1.58

75

-1

5.6

+0.6

78

+2

1.10

-3.90

AUG

74

-2

3.38

-0.55

76

+1

4.8

+0.8

77

+2

0.95

-2.98

SEP

66

-2

5.47

+2.27

65

-3

3.0

-0.2

72

+4

4.90

+1.70

OCT

59

+2

0.92

-1.65

56

-1

3.6

+1.1

55

-2

5.61

+3.04

NOV

43

-2

1.59

-1.80

51

+6

2.8

-0.6

43

-2

3.76

+0.37

AVG

57.5

+0.8

3.4

-0.8

57.3

+0.7

3.2

-0.5

58.1

+1.6

3.5

-0.2

DEP is departure from the long-term average for that location.

Table 2. Percent stand of tall fescue varieties planted October 4, 1999, in a cattle grazing tolerance study at Lexington, Kentucky.

Variety

Seedling Vigor1

Percent Stand

Nov 4, 1999

Apr 4, 2001

Oct 15, 2001

Apr 2, 2002

Oct 11, 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Duo (festulolium)

5

83

66

70

69*

KY31+ 2

4

83

66

74

61*

Cattle Club

3

80

57

64

57

Select

2

77

51

64

47

Festorina

3

72

33

53

45

BAR 9TMPO

2

78

46

62

44

Stargrazer

2

74

34

56

43

Experimental varieties

KYFA9301

4

83

69

75

65*

KYFA9304

3

85

69

76

63*

Jesup (542)3

2

81

63

72

60*

KYTF 2

3

82

68

73

60*

Ga 156L (542)3

3

80

64

71

59*

Jesup (584)3

2

86

61

75

58*

KY31- 2

3

80

65

71

55

Ga 5 (584)3

2

78

48

63

49

Ampac pp7 mix

3

60

40

53

41

BARFaBTR 6

3

71

16

38

38

Ga 7 clone (542)3

3

68

39

56

38

BARFaBTR 7

3

73

16

40

36

Ga 153E (542)3

3

68

35

55

30

Ampac pp8 mix

4

51

14

38

23

Ampac pp3 mix

5

37

8

31

21

 

Mean

2.9

74

47

61

48

CV, %

15.1

9.07

23.10

13.93

21.05

LSD, 0.05

0.51

7.70

12.40

9.65

11.64

*

Not significantly different from the highest value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being most vigorous.

2

“+” indicates variety is endophyte infected; “-“ indicates variety is endophyte free.

3

Novel endophyte tall fescue.

Table 3. Percent stand of tall fescue and timothy varieties planted September 19, 2000, in a cattle grazing tolerance study at Lexington, Kentucky.

Variety

Seedling Vigor1

Percent Endophyte Infection

Apr 9, 2001

Oct 15, 2001

Apr 2, 2002

Oct 14, 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Cattle Club

4

0

90

68

68

74*

KY31+ 2

5

60

89

74

76

74*

Hoedown

5

0

90

58

65

66*

Select

4

20

87

65

69

65*

Stargrazer

4

0

88

57

65

53

Kokanee

5

0

87

45

54

48

Tuukka (timothy)

2

0

87

22

46

6

Experimental varieties

KYFA9304

5

0

90

70

73

73*

KYFA9402

5

0

90

71

76

71*

Q4508

5

80

90

55

70

71*

AGRFA 110

4

0

87

80

68

70*

KYFA9301

5

0

89

70

75

70*

KYFA9401

5

0

90

72

74

68*

KYFA9403

5

0

90

67

71

67*

KY31- 2

5

20

90

73

77

66*

KYTF 2

4

0

89

66

69

63*

R46633

4

80

89

73

53

43

 

Mean

4.3

-

89

64

67

62

CV, %

10.51

-

2.09

11.07

10.15

16.76

LSD, 0.05

0.52

-

2.14

8.11

7.87

11.87

*

Not significantly different from the highest value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being most vigorous.

2

“+” indicates variety is endophyte infected; “-“ indicates variety is endophyte free.

3

Novel endophyte tall fescue.

Table 4. Percent stand of tall fescue varieties sown September 12, 2001, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a cattle grazing tolerance study.

Variety

Seedling Vigor1

Apr 4, 2002

Oct 15, 2002

Percent Stand

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

KY31+ 2

5

90

88*

Felina (festulolium)

4

90

86*

Festival

4

90

84*

Maximize

4

90

84*

Select

3

90

83*

Cattle Club

4

90

82*

Spring Green (festulolium)

5

90

80*

Carmine

3

90

79

Johnstone

5

90

79

Stargrazer

3

90

78

Resolute

4

14

16

Experimental varieties

KYFA9304

4

90

88*

KY31- 2

5

90

85*

KYFA9301

4

90

84*

HM43

4

90

78

K5666V

3

90

65

PP10

4

90

59

 

Mean

3.9

86

76

CV, %

10.92

1.39

9.61

LSD, 0.05

0.49

1.37

8.45

*

Not significantly different from the highest value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being most vigorous.

2

“+” indicates variety is endophyte infected; “-“ indicates variety is endophyte free.

3

Novel endophyte tall fescue.

Table 5. Percent stand of perennial ryegrass, festulolium, and prairie brome (Bromus wildenowii) varieties planted September 19, 2000, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a cattle grazing tolerance study.

Variety

Species

Seedling Vigor1 Oct 31, 2000

Percent Stand>

Apr 9, 2001

Oct 17, 2001

Apr 2, 2002

Oct 14, 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Spring Green

festulolium

4

90

70

70

66*

Duo

festulolium

4

90

64

71

61*

Linn

perennial ryegrass

3

90

71

75

58

Citadel

perennial ryegrass

3

90

31

58

56

Matua

prairie brome

4

83

40

67

35

Polly II

perennial ryegrass

5

90

8

39

16

Experimental varieties

AGRLP 103

perennial ryegrass

4

90

75

73

73*

AGRBW 101

prairie brome

4

88

51

71

58

AGRLH 101

perennial ryegrass

4

90

56

63

43

 

Mean

-

3.7

89

52

65

52

CV, %

-

14.13

1.79

15.24

10.26

21.25

LSD, 0.05

-

0.61

1.86

9.19

7.78

12.81

*

Not significantly different from the highest value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being the most vigorous.

Table 6. Seedling vigor and percent stand of perennial ryegrass varieties sown September 12, 2001, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a cattle grazing tolerance study.

Variety

Ploidy

Seedling Vigor1 Nov 2, 2001

Percent Stand

Apr 4, 2002

Oct 15, 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Grand Daddy

tetraploid

4

90

81*

Linn

diploid

3

90

80*

Aries

diploid

4

88

76*

Lasso

diploid

3

90

71*

Quartet

tetraploid

4

77

66

Polly II

tetraploid

5

83

51

Maverick Gold

diploid

5

34

16

Experimental varieties

PP 11

mixture

5

54

26

 

Mean

 

4.1

76

58

CV, %

 

8.28

15.07

15.22

LSD, 0.05

 

0.40

13.39

10.39

*

Not significantly different from the highest value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being the most vigorous.

Table 7. Seedling vigor and percent stand of orchardgrass and Kentucky bluegrass (KBG) varieties planted October 1, 1999, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a cattle grazing tolerance study.

Variety

Seedling Vigor1 Nov 11, 1999

Percent Stand

Apr 4, 2001

Oct 15, 2001

Apr 2, 2002

Oct 11, 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Hallmark 19962

3

81

60

77

68

Sidekick (KBG)

1

76

49

68

67

Tekapo

2

78

63

71

65

Hallmark 19702

3

84

58

75

61

Haymate

2

78

56

63

60

Benchmark

2

80

53

67

59

Experimental varieties

BAR Dgl 9 BTR G

1

87

58

81

79*

OG9705G

3

83

62

74

73*

KYO7G 23-335

2

80

63

75

71

BAR Dgl 9 BTR F

2

79

53

64

53

 

Mean

2

81

57

71

66

CV, %

18.44

6.15

21.61

9.39

10.22

LSD, 0.05

0.42

5.76

14.43

7.80

7.80

*

Not significantly different from the highest numerical value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being the most vigorous.

2

Seed for this test came from fields planted on dates indicated.

Table 8. Percent stand of orchardgrass and prairie brome (Bromus wildenowii) varieties planted September 19, 2000, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a cattle grazing tolerance study.

Variety

Seedling Vigor1 Oct 31, 2000

Percent Stand

Apr 9, 2001

Oct 17, 2001

Apr 2, 2002

Oct 14, 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Boone

3

90

76

76

75*

Prairie

3

89

71

73

70*

Benchmark

3

90

68

73

69*

Haymate

3

90

56

61

55

Experimental varieties

OG9705G

2

89

73

73

75*

KYO7G 23-335

2

89

68

69

66*

CAS-LG31

2

90

73

74

63

K5633D (prairie brome)

5

77

15

47

29

K5568K

3

90

73

33

21

K5632M (prairie brome)

5

83

15

52

18

 

Mean

3.1

88

59

63

54

CV, %

7.91

5.18

18.14

17.44

18.22

LSD, 0.05

0.28

5.29

12.38

12.79

11.45

*

Not significantly different from the highest value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being the most vigorous.

Table 9. Percent stand of orchardgrass varieties sown September 12, 2001, at Lexington, Kentucky, in a cattle grazing tolerance study.

Variety

Seedling Vigor1 Nov 2, 2001

Percent Stand

Apr 4, 2002

Oct 15, 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Tekapo

5

90

88*

Albert

4

90

86*

Benchmark

5

90

86*

Crown Royale

5

90

86*

Hallmark

5

90

86*

Haymate

5

90

85*

Prairie

5

90

85*

Athos

5

90

83*

Megabite

4

90

83*

Mammoth

4

90

83*

Takena

4

90

83*

Amba

4

90

76

Experimental varieties

OG9705G

3

90

86*

 

Mean

4.2

90

84

CV, %

12.60

0

6.39

LSD, 0.05

0.62

0

6.2

*

Not significantly different from the highest value in the column based on the 0.05 LSD.

1

0 to 5 scale with 5 being the most vigorous.

Table 10. Persistence of tall fescue, perennial ryegrass (PRG), prairie brome (Bromus wildenowii), festulolium, and timothy varieties under heavy grazing pressure across years and locations.

 

Lexington

19991

2000

2001

Variety

Proprietor/KY Distributor

Oct  20002

Oct 2001

Oct 2002

Oct 2001

Oct 2002

Oct 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Aries (PRG)

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

*

BAR 9TMPO

Barenbrug USA

*

 

 

 

 

 

Carmine

DLF-Jenks

 

 

 

 

 

 

Cattle Club

unknown

*

 

 

 

*

*

Citadel (PRG)

Donley Seed

 

 

 

 

 

 

Duo (festulolium)

Ampac Seed Company

*

*

*

 

*

 

Felina (festulolium)

DLF-Jenks

 

 

 

 

 

*

Festival

Pickseed West Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

*

Festorina

Advanta Seeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

Grand Daddy (PRG)

Smith Seed Services

 

 

 

 

 

*

Hoedown

Jenks Seed Connection

 

 

 

 

*

 

Johnstone

Willamette Seed Co./Public

 

 

 

 

 

 

Kokanee

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

KY31+ (endophyte infected)

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Public

*

*

*

*

*

*

Lasso (PRG)

DLF-Jenks

 

 

 

 

 

*

Linn (PRG)

Public

 

 

 

*

 

*

Matua (prairie brome)

AgResearch (USA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maverick Gold (PRG)

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

Maximize

Turf-Seed, Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

*

Polly II (PRG)

FFR/Southern States

 

 

 

 

 

 

Quartet (PRG)

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

Resolute

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

Select

FFR Cooperative

*

 

 

 

*

*

Spring Green (festulolium)

Turf-Seed, Inc.

 

 

 

*

*

*

Stargrazer

FFR/Southern States

 

 

 

 

 

 

Tuukka (timothy)

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

Experimental varieties

AGRLP103 (PRG)

AgResearch (USA)

 

 

 

*

*

 

AGRLH101 (PRG)

AgResearch (USA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGRBW101 (prairie brome)

AgResearch (USA)

 

 

 

 

 

 

AGRFA110

AgResearch (USA)

 

 

 

*

*

 

Ampac pp3 mix

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ampac pp7 mix

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

Ampac pp8 mix

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

BARFaBTR 6

Barenbrug USA

*

 

 

 

 

 

BARFaBTR 7

Barenbrug USA

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA 153E 542

GA Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

 

 

 

 

 

 

GA 156L 542

GA Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

*

*

 

 

 

GA 5 584

GA Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

 

 

 

 

 

GA 7 clone 542

GA Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

 

 

 

 

 

 

HM4

FFR Cooperative

 

 

 

 

 

 

Jesup 542

GA Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

*

*

 

 

 

Jesup 584

GA Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

*

*

 

 

 

K5666V

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

KY31- (endophyte free)

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

*

 

*

*

*

Experimental varieties (continued)

PP10

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

PP11

Ampac Seed Company

 

 

 

 

 

 

KYFA 9301

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

*

*

 

*

*

KYFA9304

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

*

*

 

*

*

KYFA9401

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

 

 

 

 

*

 

KYFA9402

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

 

 

 

 

*

 

KYFA9403

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

 

 

 

 

*

 

KYTF 2

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

*

*

*

 

*

 

Q4508

Wrightson Seed Ltd.

 

 

 

 

*

 

R4663

Wrightson Seed Ltd.

 

 

 

*

 

 

1

Establishment year.

2

Date of visual estimation of percent stand.

*

Not significantly different from the most persistent variety in the test. Shaded boxes indicate that the variety was not in the test. Open boxes indicate the variety was in the test but persistence was significantly less than the top-ranked variety in the test.

Table 11. Persistence of orchardgrass, Kentucky bluegrass (BG), and prairie brome (Bromus wildenowii) varieties under heavy grazing pressure across years and locations.

 

Lexington

19991

2000

2001

Variety

Proprietor/KY Distributor

Oct 20002

Oct 2001

Oct 2002

Oct 2001

Oct 2002

Oct 2002

Commercial varieties — available for farm use

Albert

University of Wisconsin

 

 

 

 

 

*

Amba

DLF-Jenks

 

 

 

 

 

 

Athos

DLF-Jenks

 

 

 

 

 

*

Benchmark

FFR/Southern States

 

*

 

*

*

*

Boone

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

 

 

 

*

*

 

Crown Royale

Grassland Oregon

 

 

 

 

 

*

Hallmark 19963

James VanLeeuwen

*

*

 

 

 

*

Hallmark 1970

James VanLeeuwen

*

*

 

 

 

 

Haymate

FFR/Southern States

 

*

 

 

 

*

Mammoth

DLF-Jenks

 

 

 

 

 

*

Megabite

Turf-Seed Inc.

 

 

 

 

 

*

Prairie

Turner Seed Company

 

 

 

*

*

*

Sidekick (BG)

Ampac Seeds

 

*

 

 

 

 

Takena

Smith Seed Services

 

 

 

 

 

*

Tekapo

Modern Forage Systems/Oldfields Seed

*

*

 

 

 

*

Experimental varieties

BAR Dgl 9 BTR F

Barenbrug USA

*

*

 

 

 

 

BAR Dgl 9 BTR G

Barenbrug USA

*

*

*

 

 

 

CAS-LG31

DLF-Jenks

 

 

 

*

 

 

K5568K

Ampac Seeds

 

 

 

*

 

 

K5632M (prairie brome)

Ampac Seeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

K5633D (prairie brome)

Ampac Seeds

 

 

 

 

 

 

KYO7G 23-335

KY Agric. Exp. Sta./Experimental

 

*

 

*

*

 

OG9705G

FFR Cooperative

*

*

*

*

*

*

1

Establishment year.

2

Date of visual estimation of percent stand.

3

Seed for this test came from fields planted on dates indicated.

*

Not significantly different from the most persistent variety in the test. Shaded boxes indicate that the variety was not in the test.

Open boxes indicate the variety was in the test but persistence was significantly less than the top-ranked variety in the test.

 


Equal opportunity statement